Arghajata

3 Common Misconceptions About Sustainability Mindset Every Company Must Understand

December 10, 2025

3 Common Misconceptions About Sustainability Mindset Every Company Must Understand

One of the biggest misconceptions is assuming that sustainability must start with massive projects and large investments. In reality, many sustainability practices already exist within everyday operations: reducing wasteful processes, increasing energy efficiency, improving employee well-being, or reorganizing workflow inefficiencies.

In recent years, many businesses have begun to realize that sustainability is no longer just a global trend but a fundamental part of operating models that determine long-term resilience. However, this is exactly where many misconceptions arise, leading companies to view sustainability as something far heavier, more expensive, or more complicated than it actually is.

One of the biggest misconceptions is assuming that sustainability must start with massive projects and large investments. In reality, many sustainability practices already exist within everyday operations: reducing wasteful processes, increasing energy efficiency, improving employee well-being, or reorganizing workflow inefficiencies.

This is where companies need to reframe their sustainability mindset and recognize that sustainability actually leads to more efficient operations, lower costs, and higher relevance in the eyes of customers and today’s talent. Below is the correct understanding of sustainability.

Sustainability Is Not Only an Environmental Issue

Many companies still view sustainability as an entirely “green” issue—focused solely on reducing emissions, recycling, or tree planting. This view is not entirely wrong, but it is far too narrow.

This narrow view often makes sustainability feel irrelevant to their daily operations because they assume its contribution is limited to environmental matters. In fact, if we refer to global standards such as ESG, sustainability stands on three pillars: environmental, social, and governance.

This means how a company treats its employees, the quality of management decision-making, transparency, and social responsibility are all critical components of sustainability. Many studies even indicate that the social and governance pillars contribute the most to long-term corporate resilience.

A simple example is employee well-being. Companies that implement humane working practices, clear development pathways, and healthy cultures of appreciation tend to have higher retention rates and more stable productivity.

In other words, sustainability is not only about reducing carbon footprint but also about building healthier companies with more structured processes, valued people, and more responsible decision-making. Once this perspective is understood, companies will see that sustainability is not an additional agenda—it is the foundation of a modern and relevant way of working.

Discover More : Operational Efficiency: Strategies to Reduce Costs Without Sacrificing Quality

Sustainability Is a Shared Responsibility

Another common misconception is assuming that sustainability is the responsibility of only one team or department. This may sound harmless, but it often causes sustainability issues to remain trapped inside isolated meetings and never truly embedded into organizational workflows.

Sustainability efforts will never be effective if delegated to just one team. It requires a mindset shift across all business functions—from how operations teams make daily decisions, how procurement chooses suppliers, to how leadership sets long-term strategic direction.

Without cross-functional involvement, sustainability becomes a program, not a culture. In many cases, the most meaningful changes occur when every unit understands its role.

For example, marketing teams recognizing the importance of transparent claims to avoid greenwashing, or HR teams understanding that sustainability includes employee well-being, competency development, and psychological safety. When every function sees sustainability as part of its work, organizational transformation becomes more natural and consistent.

Discover More : M&A (Merger & Akuisisi): Strategi Pertumbuhan atau Jalan Pintas?

Appearing “Green” but Not in Reality

This practice is closely associated with greenwashing, where companies claim to be environmentally friendly, sustainable, or “green,” even though their actual practices do not reflect those claims. This typically occurs through marketing messages, labels, or campaigns designed to appear environmentally conscious without substantive action behind them.

In the past, such practices often went unchecked because verifying information was difficult and relied heavily on packaging claims or promotional messaging. However, today’s market behavior has changed drastically.

Now, the public can easily verify whether a company is genuinely sustainable by comparing claims with actual practices through social media. One post, one negative review, or one small inconsistency can spread faster than a company’s clarification. As a result, greenwashing not only damages reputation but also erodes trust that may have taken years to build.

Therefore, when discussing sustainability, many companies do not lack intention—they simply misled by myths that make sustainability seem complex, costly, or relevant only for large corporations. Understanding these three points helps companies view sustainability as a business strategy that strengthens long-term resilience.

From cost savings and team stability to improved customer trust, these outcomes are achievable for companies of all sizes as long as they have the right understanding and the right steps.

If your company wants to start its sustainability journey without falling into misleading assumptions or irrelevant strategies, Arghajata Consulting is ready to assist.

Contact Arghajata Consulting and begin building a sustainability foundation that is correct, effective, and impactful.

Share this article.

Share this article.

Related Articles

Business Process

5 Strategies to Improve Team Performance Without Burnout

Building high performance in an organization does not have to drain the team’s energy. With realistic expectations, humane work systems, and a consistent culture of appreciation, companies can improve productivity without pushing employees toward burnout.

Business Process

5 Stages for Measuring Management Performance Effectively

Measuring management performance requires more than reviewing numbers on a report. Effective performance evaluation involves clear expectations, continuous monitoring, objective assessment, structured development, and fair recognition. This approach enables organizations not only to assess results, but to build a healthier, more collaborative, and growth-oriented work culture.

Business Process

The Difference Between Performance, Productivity, and Effectiveness in Corporate Management

Performance, productivity, and effectiveness are often used interchangeably in corporate discussions, yet each represents a distinct dimension of organizational success. Performance emphasizes the quality and consistency of how work is delivered, productivity focuses on how much output is generated from available resources, and effectiveness measures how accurately results align with strategic goals. Understanding the differences between these three concepts is essential for leaders who want to drive growth not only through speed and volume, but through direction and long-term impact.

Related Articles

Get in Touch

Get Weekly Insight

Subscribe for Exclusive Content

Read Our Latest Insight

images (3)
Business Process
Risk Management Strategies for Small and Medium Enterprises
d710a6a0-d4b0-11ef-9fd6-0be88a764111
E-Book
How Indonesia Is Responding to Trump’s Tariff Threats and Global Economic Uncertainty
legal-risk-management
Business Process
The Role of Governance, Risk, and Compliance (GRC) in Business Sustainability
Get Weekly Insight